The recent revelations about the Prime Minister and other Labour Party figures being landlords have sparked significant controversy, especially given Labour’s position on housing and renters’ rights.

Sir Keir Starmer’s rental income from his North London property — valued at nearly £2 million — has raised eyebrows, especially since he’s been vocal about supporting renters. The fact that he is renting out a property in a neighborhood where rents range from £3,000 to £5,000 per month is seen by some as an inconsistency with his party’s commitment to tackling the housing crisis.

This revelation is particularly sensitive given the Labour Party’s rhetoric around being “on the side of renters.” It’s worth noting that Labour MPs make up the largest proportion of landlords in Parliament, with 44 landlords in total, according to reports. In addition to Starmer, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and her husband reportedly earn £74,000 from rental income, further fueling criticism.

The issue has been exacerbated by other members of the party, such as Jas Athwal, who came under fire for the poor conditions in his rental properties, including black mould and ant infestations. Though Athwal apologized and said he would be terminating his letting agent’s contract, it’s just the latest in a series of incidents that critics say highlight a disconnect between Labour’s policies and the personal interests of some of its leading figures.

The broader implications for Labour’s credibility on housing and affordability will likely continue to be debated, as these revelations seem to challenge the party’s public stance on fairness and renters’ rights.