Since the Labour Party’s consideration of rental reform in the lead-up to the 2015 election, the dialogue around improving court efficiency has been a recurring theme. Landlords, while supportive of tenant protections, have emphasized that without efficient court access, the removal of “no-fault” evictions (Section 21) could leave them vulnerable. However, the focus on unfunded spending commitments has made it challenging for political parties to prioritize court resourcing .

The previous government faced similar challenges. Although there were commitments to balance the needs of both landlords and tenants, the actual progress on court reform was slow. Amendments were needed to ensure that the necessary reforms were implemented before Section 21 was abolished, highlighting a growing concern within landlord organizations about the future of rental stability .

Furthermore, the practical implications of delayed court proceedings are significant. For instance, possession claims can take over a year to resolve in some areas, resulting in landlords being unable to evict problematic tenants while simultaneously having well-behaved families in need of housing. This situation raises questions about fairness and the effective functioning of the legal system .

The government’s commitment to digitalizing the court process is a step in the right direction, but stakeholders are cautious about how quickly these changes will be implemented. Increased resources and staff recruitment will be essential to handle the anticipated rise in possession cases . As the landscape evolves, landlords are encouraged to engage with their MPs to advocate for necessary changes, emphasizing the importance of fair access to justice for all involved in the rental market .

For more detailed information on the challenges and potential solutions regarding court access in the context of rental reforms, you can refer to articles from sources like the Telegraph and the British Property Federation.

The full article can be seen here